View Full Version : Beef3 Server Requests
hoodieblanket
30th October 2011, 05:49 PM
Thought i'd start by requesting a 32player Mixed mode server - Rush/Conquest/TDM - No Tehran Highway. they are fun as hell
*edit* pretty please
pyro
30th October 2011, 07:40 PM
Yea would love this, always nice to mix modes up a little bit.
Toddy47
30th October 2011, 08:04 PM
Why are there so many conquest servers? I always filtered out conquest and also thought others hated it to. I guess I was wrong.
Growler
30th October 2011, 11:01 PM
Thought i'd start by requesting a 32player Mixed mode server - Rush/Conquest/TDM - No Tehran Highway. they are fun as hell
*edit* pretty please
+1
Robby06
30th October 2011, 11:22 PM
More 24 player TDM servers, the ones that are there are constantly full...also 32/64 TDM if possible with more maps...except Tehran highway...horrible map.
.osiRiS
30th October 2011, 11:29 PM
+1
Can we try jumping in this server then
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/servers/show/ff15f3c0-cebc-4dc4-a631-4b4c257859ae/NZ-ON3Network-TelstraClear-MM-10/
private_hell
31st October 2011, 12:02 AM
Why are there so many conquest servers? I always filtered out conquest and also thought others hated it to. I guess I was wrong.
conquest is a classic bf mode - and a lot of the players around here, have played the bf series since at least bf:v - hence why they like it more
pop
31st October 2011, 12:06 AM
conquest is a fast way to get points...
Codex
31st October 2011, 12:34 AM
city maps 48 player please :P
conquest
hoodieblanket
31st October 2011, 12:35 AM
Can we try jumping in this server then
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/servers/show/ff15f3c0-cebc-4dc4-a631-4b4c257859ae/NZ-ON3Network-TelstraClear-MM-10/
cheers osiris. we got the ball rolling and filled the server. It was running without any problems.
BushySB
31st October 2011, 12:41 AM
Ya was good as cheers man!!
.osiRiS
31st October 2011, 12:55 AM
so it didn't spaz out changing game modes? tdm had 32 players instead of 24?
hoodieblanket
31st October 2011, 01:07 AM
yep had 32 players. no spazzing when it changed from rush to tdm
Emrico1
31st October 2011, 02:19 AM
Please please please remove Metro on 48p CQ servers (32 seems OK).
http://www.gifbin.com/bin/032010/1268914979_cat-begging.gif
elemunk
31st October 2011, 07:09 AM
"big map" 48p conquest server: Kharg/Firestorm/Capsicum
Increased ticket count for maximum internets.
Flannel
31st October 2011, 09:24 AM
"big map" 48p conquest server: Kharg/Firestorm/Capsicum
Increased ticket count for maximum internets.
I support this request.
Nostargate
31st October 2011, 09:27 AM
^ Also 10 points to Gryffndor
In other news Tehran highway....pure aids.
Growler
31st October 2011, 09:28 AM
Will give mixed mode a smash tonight.
private_hell
31st October 2011, 09:32 AM
^^^
please
hawkwindnz
31st October 2011, 10:00 AM
"big map" 48p conquest server: Kharg/Firestorm/Capsicum
Increased ticket count for maximum internets.
Big map server such as this would be great :unconscious:
RightHandOnly
31st October 2011, 10:08 AM
whats wrong with highway.....I find good...never laggs for me...and played on large maps....what u peeps moaning about????hmmmmm
Its a good map.....are these comments about tehran highway should be in munchies moan thread.
Codex
31st October 2011, 10:32 AM
Highways a pretty good guy when it ends.
PrinceTuiTeka
31st October 2011, 10:36 AM
I really like the map. Its just the lag that's the killer. Its actually a real shame.
oefox
31st October 2011, 11:12 AM
"big map" 48p conquest server: Kharg/Firestorm/Capsicum
Increased ticket count for maximum internets.
I support this request.
could stick canals in there too, would be a good mix
and yes, remove tehran from > 32p servers, at least till they fix it lagging so much
conquest is my favourite mode, not so linear and spammy like rush and more tactical than tdm
Mayhem_Lee
31st October 2011, 11:17 AM
"big map" 48p conquest server: Kharg/Firestorm/Capsicum
Increased ticket count for maximum internets.
This + add canals in there aswell
Demandred
31st October 2011, 11:18 AM
^ yes please
5tacK
31st October 2011, 12:01 PM
I'd +1 any server combination in this thread, especially Conquest Large maps.
-1 for any mixed modes with TDM in them, worse than CoD with 'Enemy Spawns Behind Syndrome' tbh.
deadmeatwalking
31st October 2011, 12:08 PM
an aviation server :P
Plasma
31st October 2011, 12:24 PM
+1 for a Conquest Large maps server.
ReaperNet
31st October 2011, 12:38 PM
Yes to large maps, conquest, 48p on 64.
And start with KHARG, that map being at the end of server rotation is sad. Server crashes or I get disconnected before that map is played. :(
Machpants
31st October 2011, 01:27 PM
Add canals to it too IMO
Emrico1
31st October 2011, 02:41 PM
Kharg, firestorm then damavand then canals imo. CQ 48 on 64 rotation would be so joy.
Codex
31st October 2011, 02:43 PM
Kharg, firestorm then damavand then canals imo. CQ 48 on 64 rotation would be so joy.
Oh lawd yes
bLuNt
31st October 2011, 02:56 PM
...except Tehran highway...horrible map.
What's wrong with this map??
Growler
31st October 2011, 03:01 PM
Cuntquest Capsicum with no guns, planes, helis or tanks. Only jeeps.
Flannel
31st October 2011, 03:06 PM
People like canals? IMO too small & air combat ceiling/boundaries are to low.
Mayhem_Lee
31st October 2011, 03:55 PM
People like canals? IMO too small & air combat ceiling/boundaries are to low.
Its rather good fun for choppers and tanks etc. Makes for a change from jets
oefox
31st October 2011, 04:08 PM
Kharg, firestorm then damavand then canals imo. CQ 48 on 64 rotation would be so joy.
Hmmm, replace damavand with caspian IMO
And canals is a great map, lots of different paths and not choked, is why I don't think damavand should be in that rotation.
oefox
31st October 2011, 04:12 PM
What's wrong with this map??
I actually like this map and the night scene, but lag is terrible and ruins the experience, is the only map I get lag on and in copious amouts...running into brick walls non stop, head shooting a full clip only to see target turn and kill you, or multiple fail stabs. Is probably some stupid setting ruining this map but ruined nonetheless.
.osiRiS
31st October 2011, 04:44 PM
What do you mean by this ? "CQ 48 on 64 rotation would be so joy." All the 48p servers are running the large map sets with restricted player numbers.
Codex
31st October 2011, 04:47 PM
yeah he's just meaning 48 player on 64 size not 48 size (if there's a difference in bf3)
Mayhem_Lee
31st October 2011, 04:48 PM
Speaking of 24on32 Servers
http://i1001.photobucket.com/albums/af133/mayheml33/cheekybuggers.jpg
Cheeky buggers
.osiRiS
31st October 2011, 04:52 PM
yeah he's just meaning 48 player on 64 size not 48 size (if there's a difference in bf3)
Oh yea nah there isn't you have ConquestSmall which is 32 and less and ConquestLarge with is 33-64. Guess you could go Large with 2 ppl but overkill of space.
Nothing new mayhem :shame:
Obble
31st October 2011, 05:29 PM
Mayhem_Lee;1443103']Speaking of 24on32 Servers
http://i1001.photobucket.com/albums/af133/mayheml33/cheekybuggers.jpg
Cheeky buggers
It's like ICONZ all over again.
.osiRiS
31st October 2011, 08:40 PM
Mixed Created
Big Maps Created.
Mayhem_Lee
31st October 2011, 08:51 PM
Mixed Created
Big Maps Created.
Champion
ReaperNet
31st October 2011, 11:11 PM
Mixed Created
Big Maps Created.
What server number is big maps dude?
Plasma
31st October 2011, 11:12 PM
What server number is big maps dude?
#17 or #18 I think. Has big maps or something in the name
Machpants
31st October 2011, 11:13 PM
BIG maps, win thanks. Once the back end (phnar phnar) is sorted I'll try and get on :)
Codex
31st October 2011, 11:55 PM
Mixed Created
Big Maps Created.
Awesome, perhaps city maps too? :D
Grand Bazaar, Seine Crossing, highway (once unlagged,) kark when released? metro? 48 cq
Scorched_onion
1st November 2011, 12:54 AM
Make the conquest rounds longer they're way too short
Emrico1
1st November 2011, 03:16 AM
What do you mean by this ? "CQ 48 on 64 rotation would be so joy." All the 48p servers are running the large map sets with restricted player numbers.
I meant that rotation of maps would be joy
oefox
1st November 2011, 10:43 AM
That big maps server was awesome fun but keeped disconnecting people last night, would be full then i'd get kicked, then would see the server at 0/48...is this an EA problem that will get fixed?
+1 for small map CQ server as Codex requested, those 4 maps make for some good constant action. 32p with tehran would work, 48p without.
winter
1st November 2011, 12:56 PM
With all the conq servers, turn them into single maps (no rotation) :P
I hate missing a cool map and have to wait out the rotation :(
=C=
1st November 2011, 01:01 PM
I've been playing nothing but HC servers. It's very HARD CORE>! :D
ReaperNet
1st November 2011, 09:13 PM
Can Damavand Peak be removed from big maps server please?
I'm not sure why it would be included, it's not exactly big.
HandofBlood
2nd November 2011, 08:49 PM
Big Maps Created.
2nd Server? first ones always full lol.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.5 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.