View Full Version : Iconz Results Thread
xcuzznxtimmyx
17th December 2007, 09:39 PM
Well i'll start off,
GM 13 - [A] - 2
well done to GM, it shows how much work they've put in compared to us. We've got alot to learn about scrimming with out snakey and dirty and kg ;D
cheers boys
Hazard
17th December 2007, 09:41 PM
GG guys, GM. took the match 13-2
prolax
17th December 2007, 09:43 PM
gg guys
`Dirty Heathen
17th December 2007, 09:53 PM
spectators mode would not let me see the final score and every quit before I could confirm.
Pretty sure it was
Sila 13- [z]7
Sorry guys should have explained to you that i would be joining teams and spectating before hand its the only way I can really see whats going on in a lot of the maps.
switch.
17th December 2007, 09:54 PM
sila 13 - [z] 7
was a good game, bit of a crap map with the MG's though, A is pretty much shutdown by it.
R3DM@N
17th December 2007, 09:54 PM
gg guys good effort !
3N][X
17th December 2007, 10:03 PM
geegee [A] was most fun. :)
xcuzznxtimmyx
17th December 2007, 10:13 PM
lol our defense was shocking
Matt
17th December 2007, 10:14 PM
Can someone give me a lowdown on how the spectating is done (as the servers are password protected)...Would be keen to see the 9:30 games
xcuzznxtimmyx
17th December 2007, 10:17 PM
Can someone give me a lowdown on how the spectating is done (as the servers are password protected)...Would be keen to see the 9:30 games
dirtys a ref
i dont think you can spectate unless you are one
Hazard
17th December 2007, 10:18 PM
you can't spectate the games sorry. Would love to be able to have some sort of Tournament TV, but there isn't one that I have found for COD4.
We are working on getting some games shoutcasted, but that won't be until next year.
Matt
17th December 2007, 10:19 PM
ah, I assume 3N][X isn't playing for TBAG then (and in GM or A?) lol, my bad
xcuzznxtimmyx
17th December 2007, 10:21 PM
ah, I assume 3N][X isn't playing for TBAG then (and in GM or A?) lol, my bad
GM
`Dirty Heathen
17th December 2007, 11:01 PM
Crex 13- NZR2 1
nevjmac
17th December 2007, 11:14 PM
Crex did awesome on defense nailing us to 12 - 0, we were lucky to snatch a round before a flawless victory...
GG crex, our boys need some growing to do together
I also agree that downpour = gay cause of the MG defending A, though I managed to snipe him a couple of times :P
Macedonian
17th December 2007, 11:42 PM
Sila2. 13 - 12 [tsw]
GG was a pretty intense game.
prolax
17th December 2007, 11:42 PM
it was a good game between affliction, the MG was hardly used at all tbh.
Cripple
17th December 2007, 11:52 PM
Sila2. 13 - 12 [tsw]
GG was a pretty intense game.
Was a little miffed when it went into the 25th round, and again when it didn't switch sides.
Nm it was a gg.
Snake_Daddy
17th December 2007, 11:59 PM
yer its abit of a tough one that. specially on such a one sided map. Just about need to do a coin toss
Hazard
18th December 2007, 12:03 AM
yeah it's something I will look into.
Might need to amend the rules so everyone is clear on that if I can't change the overtime setting.
swindle
18th December 2007, 12:07 AM
Some scores i didn't expect. Sounds like good games though.
R3DM@N
18th December 2007, 01:14 AM
epic fail from swindle..again!
zolteg
18th December 2007, 01:39 AM
Sila2. 13 - 12 [tsw]
GG was a pretty intense game.
Woulda been awesome to watch. Nothing like a close nail biting finish....
WD Sila2.
sad.act
18th December 2007, 01:45 AM
Get a demo from someone.
cashie
18th December 2007, 03:30 AM
it was a good game between affliction, the MG was hardly used at all tbh.
not even,u guys had it sussed ,must of got boring ,we failed,i didnt expect it to just switch sides with no notice, i didnt even know we had swapped and was wondering where the fuck i had spawned then a nade wasted me,but yeah
gg guys ,
Vandal
18th December 2007, 02:18 PM
epic fail from swindle..again!
............
Goldo
18th December 2007, 03:18 PM
Don't get touchy, they know each other from cs:s
Snake_Daddy
18th December 2007, 05:49 PM
Woulda been awesome to watch. Nothing like a close nail biting finish....
WD Sila2.
yer i got to watch. I was going fuck this close it was down to three v three as tsw just planted. very cool to watch it could of been anyones. tsw did very well to plant on such a cunty attacking map.
Also I have a demo. I just have to figure out how to play it. And guess I have to ask both teams if I can up it
frostalarm
18th December 2007, 06:35 PM
Also I have a demo. I just have to figure out how to play it.
Aparently you go into cod4 (multiplayer), turn off the modern warfare thing in the mod option. Then it will change it to cod4 mod or something. Then you just type /demo (demo name) , for example , /demo ICONZtournament#1 etc
prolax
18th December 2007, 06:48 PM
There was a thread in here awhile going with a program that will play cod4 demo's, seismovision I think it was called.
Fubar
18th December 2007, 08:07 PM
I just have to figure out how to play it. And guess I have to ask both teams if I can up it
Playing back a recorded demo
Unfortunately, the guys at IW haven't made a good job of developing this function in CoD4
Recorded demos are stored in "C:\Program Files\Activision\Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare\main\demos" folder
However, you will need to cut/paste your demos from this folder and paste them into:
"C:\Program Files\Activision\Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare\Mods\ModWarfare\demos"
If the demos folder doesn't exist, simply create it.
With that done, run cod4 multiplayer and select 'Mods' then 'Modwarefare'
Open up console and type /demo demoname
This will play your recorded demo.
sad.act
18th December 2007, 09:21 PM
It works for me without going to modwarfare.
5loth
18th December 2007, 09:22 PM
if the demo is from a modded server, needs to be launched from in modwarfare.
gliss
18th December 2007, 09:32 PM
Nightingale vs TBag 13-1 to N
GG Tbag was a good game pitty you only had 4 players.
`Dirty Heathen
18th December 2007, 09:33 PM
Confirmed.
Snake_Daddy
18th December 2007, 09:36 PM
yer well done baron taking out the whole n team in the first round
swindle
18th December 2007, 10:59 PM
epic fail from swindle..again!
Don't you start with me boy!
yer well done baron taking out the whole n team in the first round
That was pretty lol
Good game guys. Sad you could only have 4, but played well under those conditions. GG.
`Dirty Heathen
18th December 2007, 11:06 PM
GD 13-0 DD
Snake_Daddy
18th December 2007, 11:17 PM
13-6 to 28thmb
BeNZene
18th December 2007, 11:25 PM
DD - Thanks for the game guys, and good luck for the rest of the tourny.
zolteg
19th December 2007, 12:34 AM
DD - Thanks for the game guys, and good luck for the rest of the tourny.
Cheers man. You guys were pretty professional and had the map sewn up.
nataS
19th December 2007, 08:38 AM
if the demo is from a modded server, needs to be launched from in modwarfare.
Use Seismovision.
=C=
19th December 2007, 10:15 PM
Crex did awesome on defense nailing us to 12 - 0, we were lucky to snatch a round before a flawless victory...
GG crex, our boys need some growing to do together
I also agree that downpour = gay cause of the MG defending A, though I managed to snipe him a couple of times :P
It was well played. One thing when we swapped sides I was expecting the 45sec time to setup weapons etc, but half the team rushed other was in spawn and it sort of didn't go to well but you've had us there, 2nd round we were set :)
It's a shame we didn't manage to get that bonus point.
PS. GL to you guys in the tournament.
BeNZene
19th December 2007, 10:42 PM
Cheers man. You guys were pretty professional and had the map sewn up.
It would be fair to say we had practiced. But you guys were 1 down for some of your attacking rounds, and given the imbalance of that map (see other thread), that must've hurt a lot.
Hazard
20th December 2007, 09:54 PM
ISF vs 9th was a tight game, 9th secured the win 13-8
GG both teams, was great to watch.
Wodger
20th December 2007, 09:54 PM
GG 9th that one got the blood pumping lol
Thetruereddevil
20th December 2007, 09:57 PM
well played 9th
han16
20th December 2007, 11:01 PM
ISF vs 9th was a tight game, 9th secured the win 13-8
GG both teams, was great to watch.
Yup no bull here...good game...
Good fun...man the mounted machine gun owns the whole right side on attck...nice going there...
9th.PirateJafa
20th December 2007, 11:08 PM
It was a pleasure to scrim you guys again in a new game.
The most fun I have ever had in a round of Downpour, I must say. http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/3456/gobiconcoolfl5.gif
Kudos to you for being willing to wait the extra couple of minutes for Squiggles to sort out the patch and Punkbuster. It's that sort of thing that really says something about a team.
Look forward to our next match with you guys. http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/8467/gobiconcheersrp3.gif
pyro
20th December 2007, 11:08 PM
Sadly skulls were a no show so we won on forfeit.
SirGrimNZ
20th December 2007, 11:20 PM
Sadly skulls were a no show so we won on forfeit.
Strange,they showd up and won the NZ qw comp.Perhaps they just couldn't get the numbers.A shame really.
winfieldsaregoo
20th December 2007, 11:24 PM
13-1 to dc gg bam was fun
Thetruereddevil
21st December 2007, 03:02 AM
Yup no bull here...good game...
Good fun...man the mounted machine gun owns the whole right side on attck...nice going there...
I had some fun on that until you started the sniper business;)
`Dirty Heathen
21st December 2007, 09:43 AM
13-1 to dc gg bam was fun
Shame you guys where are player down Bam I think it would have been a close game with that extra person.
Chook
21st December 2007, 10:14 AM
Sadly skulls were a no show so we won on forfeit.
Yea i had only seen one skullz player on COD4 prior to our "match" so i ran a player search and found only skullz'mule has played (which is the one i saw). Maybe their players still need to purchase cod4 lol.
Hazard
21st December 2007, 09:16 PM
no show from SOR2, so <<SD>> win be forfeit.
Hazard
14th January 2008, 09:23 PM
no show from SOR2, win by default to NZR2
prolax
14th January 2008, 10:00 PM
well that sucks...
SirGrimNZ
14th January 2008, 10:04 PM
well that sucks...
Indeed,everyone was fired up and ready to go...NZR2 would have taken it anyway,lol
sad.act
14th January 2008, 10:12 PM
Teams that fuck people around should be removed.
`Dirty Heathen
14th January 2008, 10:34 PM
yep I agree.
Crex win by forfeit.
`Dirty Heathen
14th January 2008, 10:35 PM
I hope I got this right.
Skulls 13 - 10 Sila2
=C=
14th January 2008, 10:45 PM
yep I agree.
Crex win by forfeit.
Lost on the bonus point ;/
Hazard
14th January 2008, 11:07 PM
.exe 13 - 9th 2
GG guys, was fun to watch
han16
14th January 2008, 11:09 PM
Not from this angle
Hazard
14th January 2008, 11:12 PM
I was watching from above... I enjoyed it as I felt like God tbh :P
pyro
14th January 2008, 11:20 PM
Yea was a good game guys, sorry about the delay at the start. Must be an issue with the nz gateway our guy couldnt see connect to any iconz servers.
Chook
15th January 2008, 12:51 AM
yea thanks for the game it was a good first war.
nevjmac
15th January 2008, 01:03 AM
I only got back on sunday to find we had a game on sunday. So I would have expected this week to be a few defaults.
Yet I got hassled by prolax for not having the time to search google for a birds eye view for the map :P gee as if moving into a new house and making sure I had internet up before the match wasn't time consuming enough :P cheers prolax :P
sad.act
15th January 2008, 03:20 AM
lol Anyone keen on uploading a demo?
They're good to watch imo when you get sick of actually playing CoD :D
Hazard
15th January 2008, 10:04 AM
I demo'ed the game... but my camera work is crap at best, and sometimes I was MSN'ing and forgot to move around, so it's a pretty dull demo. But if you want it then I can fire it through some time this evening.
Chook
15th January 2008, 10:57 AM
I can chuck mine on my ftp and link it to you after work.
However pyros would probably be more fun to watch.
Then again i did knife people.. pyros got no mullins knife skillz :P
sad.act
15th January 2008, 03:27 PM
lol, someone upload something imo.
Chook
15th January 2008, 03:38 PM
is that you in your avatar sad.act?
Humerous facials.
sad.act
15th January 2008, 03:40 PM
Yeah that's how I play, you gotta be alert and in a somewhat happy mood to kill shit best.
pyro
15th January 2008, 05:39 PM
I can chuck mine on my ftp and link it to you after work.
However pyros would probably be more fun to watch.
Then again i did knife people.. pyros got no mullins knife skillz :P
lol yea no mullins knife action for me, I can't help it if I kill them to quickly to get in close enough. I'll u/l my demo some where later and post the link.
jism
15th January 2008, 08:17 PM
haha yer i got 2 knifes that game
Hazard
15th January 2008, 09:56 PM
What a game!! My heart rate went up and I was just watching!
13-11 to [tsw]
truely epic battle, had no idea which way it was going to go... even the last one on one. Great game [tsw] and 28MB
nataS
15th January 2008, 09:58 PM
Well played TSW. Was great fun. Good luck in the tourny.
`Dirty Heathen
15th January 2008, 09:59 PM
N 13- 11 DC
was a good game very close most of the time well played guys.
swindle
15th January 2008, 09:59 PM
GG <<DC>> was a tight game. You guys played well :)
Hayesy
15th January 2008, 10:07 PM
GG <<DC>> was a tight game. You guys played well :)
yeah prob the best scrim ive had so far.
GG
1dafull_
15th January 2008, 10:15 PM
gg you guys played well
Snake_Daddy
15th January 2008, 11:06 PM
SD 13-9 DD
zolteg
15th January 2008, 11:08 PM
SD 13-9 DD
Cheers to the SD boys. Well played.
tomatoes
15th January 2008, 11:09 PM
Thanks DD was an awesome game
`Dirty Heathen
15th January 2008, 11:14 PM
Affliction 13- 10 SOR
Well played.
genesis_wolf
15th January 2008, 11:16 PM
yea thanks to S.O.R for a match well played
ps... sorry about the few knife in that last round
G!mp
15th January 2008, 11:32 PM
wd <<SD>> you played well. Thanks for the fun. Spamalots!! :chuckle:
5loth
16th January 2008, 12:13 AM
close games.
they're the best :)
Chook
16th January 2008, 11:03 AM
Ok i watched my demo and on fear of being kicked out of the team for complete uselessness i have decided not to post it up... i must have just about naded Mrsin 2 or 3 times ahaha.
Goldo
16th January 2008, 02:59 PM
I <3 demos. Should get the final casted by gamestah and get them to do a demo, the one they did for ZR and reck~ was pro.
Hazard
16th January 2008, 03:09 PM
I contacted them but haven't heard back yet.
I'll flick them another email, but does anyone have any hook ups with them at all?
Chook
16th January 2008, 03:22 PM
i played against a reck~ player last night on PUG he didn't seem too bad a player.. who are they? some auzzie clan i suppose.
The Tick
16th January 2008, 03:29 PM
I <3 demos. Should get the final casted by gamestah and get them to do a demo, the one they did for ZR and reck~ was pro.
The gamestah demo was crap man! go download the zenaku PoV on from CG website...now that is a good demo. :-)
p.s. ~reck = are number 4 in the CGo ladder -> very good Ausi team.
Goldo
16th January 2008, 03:35 PM
i played against a reck~ player last night on PUG he didn't seem too bad a player.. who are they? some auzzie clan i suppose.
Man, you can't just stick to the NZ community :\ I loled when someone told me .txt were just a joke/rip off of .exe - they're an aussie team.
The gamestah demo was crap man! go download the zenaku PoV on from CG website...now that is a good demo. :-)
p.s. ~reck = are number 4 in the CGo ladder -> very good Ausi team.
Really? I liked it :< I might d/l it later today if I can be fucked, watched both the gamestah demo and the one from qmX and ZR last night at like 7am :S
Chook
16th January 2008, 03:44 PM
I dont just stick to NZ.. but there are 175 teams in cybergamer how the hell am i supposed to know them all lol.
Goldo
16th January 2008, 03:47 PM
Well reck~ are number 4 :P
sad.act
16th January 2008, 04:06 PM
i played against a reck~ player last night on PUG he didn't seem too bad a player.. who are they? some auzzie clan i suppose.
Umm one of the best.. lol.
The gamestah demo was crap man! go download the zenaku PoV on from CG website...now that is a good demo. :-)
Link? I only see one from xtc and kudios.
SirGrimNZ
16th January 2008, 05:41 PM
I dont just stick to NZ.. but there are 175 teams in cybergamer how the hell am i supposed to know them all lol.
And i think GA ladder is at 110 ish.
elemunk
16th January 2008, 05:52 PM
GA's setup is average at best imo, perks including last stand, UAV and Martyrdom in a ladder = fail.
Cybergamer is where the big boys play _b
The Tick
16th January 2008, 07:14 PM
...
Link? I only see one from xtc and kudios.
oops...Sorry not zenaku, Kudios demo was the one I was talking about...good watch!
swindle
16th January 2008, 09:36 PM
How the fuck do you watch those fucking demos?
BeNZene
16th January 2008, 09:39 PM
13-8 to [z] over =[GD]=
Good game guys, and good luck for the rest of the comp.
Cheers,
NZBJH
=[GD]= Clan Captain
sad.act
16th January 2008, 09:42 PM
How the fuck do you watch those fucking demos?
Put them into Players/Demos folder, rename to something shorter and quick to type, then on the cod menu type 'demo demoname'.
Hazard
16th January 2008, 09:48 PM
=ISF= 13 - 6 NZR
Good game guys
Wodger
16th January 2008, 09:51 PM
Cheers NZR was a fun game
Thetruereddevil
16th January 2008, 09:55 PM
Thanks NZR well played, good luck for the rest of the tourney:)
kookynic
16th January 2008, 09:59 PM
GG NZR - i was stuck in Sub. :(:violin:
swindle
16th January 2008, 10:00 PM
Put them into Players/Demos folder, rename to something shorter and quick to type, then on the cod menu type 'demo demoname'.
Yeah had to rename them. Was making me rage.
=ISF= 13 - 6 NZR
Good game guys
Did not expect that, well done ISF.
Goldo
16th January 2008, 10:05 PM
GA's setup is average at best imo, perks including last stand, UAV and Martyrdom in a ladder = fail.
Cybergamer is where the big boys play _b
+1
GA is a joke.
swindle
16th January 2008, 10:09 PM
What does _b mean?
5loth
16th January 2008, 10:16 PM
thumbs up.
Hazard
16th January 2008, 10:55 PM
default win to GM.
elemunk
16th January 2008, 10:58 PM
13 - 10 win to sila.
GGz
Also you have PAM4 on the server, but your not actually using most of the Pam4 settings, Sniper is not beefed up (all tags no hits), bomb tock time os 50 seconds (wtf?) and there is no round delay, also missing players left counter that goes down the bottem right.
Hazard
16th January 2008, 11:00 PM
I'm aware of most of them, slight balls up on my behalf and will be fixed before round 3. But round delay? Can you clearify this one for me?
switch.
16th January 2008, 11:00 PM
GG aK
you should add extra ammo to all the kits aswell, everyone was running out of ammo tonight and it made clutching very difficult.
elemunk
16th January 2008, 11:02 PM
Usually after you win or lose the round, the next one begins but there is a 10 second round delay then your off.
Currently you finish the round, and you straight back into it with no delay.
Hazard
16th January 2008, 11:02 PM
k, thanks for that. Things will be sorted by round 3.
swindle
16th January 2008, 11:03 PM
More ammo would be good :)
switch.
16th January 2008, 11:03 PM
yeah its usefull so you can change kits/special nades between rounds.
GoGoWaffles
16th January 2008, 11:12 PM
Also you have PAM4 on the server, but your not actually using most of the Pam4 settings, Sniper is not beefed up (all tags no hits), bomb tock time os 50 seconds (wtf?) and there is no round delay, also missing players left counter that goes down the bottem right.
rofl, yeh, we were so confused half the time :P. the amount of times id be talking about what to do in the round and it had already started :S
gg, what are the health/damage settings setup as to, my mp5 just didn't seem to have as much "kick" to it, might've just been the extra 40 ping though :/
Goldo
17th January 2008, 12:37 AM
Sounds like a gg, host demoZ plz.
R3DM@N
17th January 2008, 01:32 AM
Man what a mean game our one was, I had to sit on a server for 10mins for no one to show up!
HAAH
prolax
17th January 2008, 01:53 AM
atleast I managed to crash the server somehow..
BeNZene
17th January 2008, 08:33 AM
k, thanks for that. Things will be sorted by round 3.
Once those changes are made, it would be useful if you could post a link to a copy of the cfg :)
(Pretty please with sugar on top)
brucewillis2
17th January 2008, 10:47 AM
13 - 10 win to sila.
GGz
Also you have PAM4 on the server, but your not actually using most of the Pam4 settings, Sniper is not beefed up (all tags no hits), bomb tock time os 50 seconds (wtf?) and there is no round delay, also missing players left counter that goes down the bottem right.
sounds like a goody... sets things up for a good final if ak starts scrimming more.
=C=
17th January 2008, 11:39 AM
GA's setup is average at best imo, perks including last stand, UAV and Martyrdom in a ladder = fail.
Cybergamer is where the big boys play _b
GA allowing perks and UAV's that's a fail ladder setup.
brucewillis2
17th January 2008, 12:33 PM
all perks?? that's a bit shit.
If they started a domination ladder with all perks I'd be keen though.
hobdar
21st January 2008, 04:56 PM
wd <<SD>> you played well. Thanks for the fun. Spamalots!! :chuckle:
Thanks sorry for posting so late good game.............guys.....I thought after the first 3 rounds we were going to get hammered.....
:bigglasse
blight
21st January 2008, 09:29 PM
[z] 13 - 0 <<SD>>
Hazard
21st January 2008, 09:40 PM
sila2. 13 - 3 9th
GG guys
Hazard
21st January 2008, 09:41 PM
Blight, check your PM's please
9th.PirateJafa
21st January 2008, 09:42 PM
GG sila. Was fun playing you in BF, and is fun playing you in CoD too. :)
winfieldsaregoo
21st January 2008, 10:52 PM
ak' raped us 13-zip gg boys. do any of you have a spear banndaid
nataS
21st January 2008, 11:11 PM
28th|MB| 13 - 10 Skullz
11197
gliss
22nd January 2008, 02:15 AM
Um natas wats up with the 'y' in victory and scores?
sad.act
22nd January 2008, 02:27 AM
Um natas wats up with the 'y' in victory and scores?
Because the words come up in arabic or something first... Watch a demo and slow it down at the end of the round.
skippy
22nd January 2008, 02:34 AM
Stop cheating mike :D
nataS
22nd January 2008, 08:44 AM
Shut up Skippy
nevjmac
22nd January 2008, 12:59 PM
all perks?? that's a bit shit.
If they started a domination ladder with all perks I'd be keen though.
I totally agree, Domination would be fun, even with perks etc
Goldo
22nd January 2008, 02:10 PM
I totally agree, Domination would be fun, even with perks etc
...
perks are aids
BeNZene
22nd January 2008, 10:03 PM
13-2 to Sila.
Good game guys - good luck for the rest of the tourny.
prolax
22nd January 2008, 10:49 PM
GM. 13 - 1 <S.O.R>
gg
R3DM@N
22nd January 2008, 10:51 PM
Gg fellaz
SneakyNZ
22nd January 2008, 10:53 PM
GG <S.O.R>, I only got 5 kills though. I wanted you all to attack A more lol
skippy
22nd January 2008, 10:56 PM
13-2 to Sila.
Good game guys - good luck for the rest of the tourny.
gg, gl to you guys too!
http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/6836/shot0001sm9.jpg
gliss
22nd January 2008, 11:01 PM
GG Crex was an awesome game. N 8-13 Crex.
Marak2.0
22nd January 2008, 11:20 PM
Because the words come up in arabic or something first... Watch a demo and slow it down at the end of the round.
yes that is the letter k in arabic
=C=
22nd January 2008, 11:43 PM
GG Crex was an awesome game. N 8-13 Crex.
Well played guys,
GG.
Chook
22nd January 2008, 11:52 PM
NZR did not show for the exe vs NZR match.
prolax
22nd January 2008, 11:56 PM
I thought NZR left the ICONZ tourny
EDIT: Talked to sirgrim and they HAVE pulled out of the ICONZ tourny but have not had time to contact hazard.
moya
23rd January 2008, 08:20 AM
Its dissapointing that <<SD>> couldn't accept the result without crying "hax".
crazy_legs
23rd January 2008, 09:33 AM
GG Crex was an awesome game. N 8-13 Crex.
gg -n-, game very much enjoyed. My score was UBER.
Benji77
23rd January 2008, 10:08 PM
13-9 to soa
GG TBAG
[TBAG] MrFiskIt
23rd January 2008, 10:11 PM
13-9 to soa
GG TBAG
GG - thought we had you there for a bit. but then you won 5 in a row. must of turned your haxs on :-p
score confirmed.
Benji77
23rd January 2008, 10:14 PM
MrFiskIt;640875']GG - thought we had you there for a bit. but then you won 5 in a row. must of turned your haxs on :-p
score confirmed.
haha. fucking had an awesome shot at the start, when u went to run across the road
awesome game guys. i thought u had us there for a bit aswell
[TBAG] MrFiskIt
23rd January 2008, 10:43 PM
haha. fucking had an awesome shot at the start, when u went to run across the road
awesome game guys. i thought u had us there for a bit aswell
yeah - i was running down the main street cause i thought we were knife fighting for the start. they changed the rules though since they started with this PAM 4 stuff. so my bad.
Thetruereddevil
23rd January 2008, 10:56 PM
ISF win by default over 01
Benji77
23rd January 2008, 11:05 PM
MrFiskIt;640903']yeah - i was running down the main street cause i thought we were knife fighting for the start. they changed the rules though since they started with this PAM 4 stuff. so my bad.
no1 was sure what the hell was going on lol
BeNZene
23rd January 2008, 11:23 PM
ISF win by default over 01
Shame you can't kick vote for being AFK.
swindle
23rd January 2008, 11:51 PM
bl N
Cripple
24th January 2008, 09:51 PM
Forfeit win to TSW, Affliction couldn't get 4 :(
genesis_wolf
24th January 2008, 10:01 PM
yea sorry guys had players away for personal reasons
brucewillis2
25th January 2008, 10:22 AM
this is not directed at Affliction but I am noticing that there are quite a few forfeits and we are dealing with only 5 players here.
game losing its steam?
5loth
25th January 2008, 11:01 AM
this is not directed at Affliction but I am noticing that there are quite a few forfeits and we are dealing with only 5 players here.
game losing its steam?
i'd say not. its still the most played game aside from cs and WoW,
and CyberGamer has over 100 active teams in their current ladder.
tbh i'd just say some of the teams here lack organisation/dedication.
genesis_wolf
25th January 2008, 11:26 AM
dedication i think to blame for our little forfiet which we prob wud have lost anyways we have just had a bad week of people being away and rl things getting in the way which i have no problem withi mean rl is more important rite well to me it is
Xt1ncT
25th January 2008, 11:31 AM
this is not directed at Affliction but I am noticing that there are quite a few forfeits and we are dealing with only 5 players here.
game losing its steam?
i'd say not. its still the most played game aside from cs and WoW,
and CyberGamer has over 100 active teams in their current ladder.
tbh i'd just say some of the teams here lack organisation/dedication.Probably won't take long for it to though.
Let's face it, if we're honest the game isn't as good as BF2 - it's just BF2 is getting a bit old now. It certainly isn't as good to scrim.
Don't forget in BF2, a team with a good strat which they have down to a t, will normally beat a team with exellent individuals with little or no strat.
Whereas in CoD4 IMO it's the opposite.
Once "the next BF2" arrives, CoD4 will be dumped - maybe not by the hardcore teams that are fomr the CoD community, but certainly by clans who are used to the other games.
-CowwieStyle-
25th January 2008, 11:36 AM
tbh i'd just say some of the teams here lack organisation/dedication.
^Right on the money.
elemunk
25th January 2008, 11:40 AM
I doubt it.
This game is WAY better than BF2, and rumours are rife that this game will make WGC, maybe not this year, but alot of talk about 2009.
CoD4 won't be going anywhere, you can quote me on that _b.
-CowwieStyle-
25th January 2008, 11:42 AM
Once "the next BF2" arrives, CoD4 will be dumped - maybe not by the hardcore teams that are fomr the CoD community, but certainly by clans who are used to the other games.
Ditto providing bf3 doesn't get console ea bastardized(i have a sneaky feeling it will judging by gaming trends(just look at parts of Cod4 ack..), cross fingers it doesn't).
switch.
25th January 2008, 11:45 AM
Probably won't take long for it to though.
Let's face it, if we're honest the game isn't as good as BF2 - it's just BF2 is getting a bit old now. It certainly isn't as good to scrim.
Don't forget in BF2, a team with a good strat which they have down to a t, will normally beat a team with exellent individuals with little or no strat.
Whereas in CoD4 IMO it's the opposite.
Once "the next BF2" arrives, CoD4 will be dumped - maybe not by the hardcore teams that are fomr the CoD community, but certainly by clans who are used to the other games.
ahahahahaha
that may be your opinion, however it is flawed :D
bf2 is certainly not better than this game, its different and the two cant really be compared, some will like bf2 more and others will prefer cod4.
strats make all the difference in cod4 aswell, i think you havent played enough competitive teams. because if you play someone with a decent strat you will find you wont have a chance no matter how skilled you are.
cod4 requires alot more teamwork and communication between your team, in battlefield its just one commander yelling orders at everyone.
cod4 also takes alot more fps skill than bf2, so alot of average bf2 players wouldnt like it for that reason.
Spigalau
25th January 2008, 11:45 AM
I doubt it.
This game is WAY better than CS:S, and rumours are rife that this game will make WGC, maybe not this year, but alot of talk about 2009.
CoD4 won't be going anywhere, you can quote me on that _b.
Edited for truth, quoted for accuracy.
COD4 is not a replacement for BF2, it's a replacement for CS/CS:S. If Frontlines: FOW is any good, I can foresee a lot of COD4 teams having issues fielding players in a months time.
`Dirty Heathen
25th January 2008, 11:49 AM
I doubt it.
This game is WAY better than BF2, and rumours are rife that this game will make WGC, maybe not this year, but alot of talk about 2009.
CoD4 won't be going anywhere, you can quote me on that _b.
I think COD4 is good game to scrim.
However most of us are from Bf2 I used to play CS/CSS once I played Bf2 I never went back.
Point is being that a lot of us are from Bf2 when Bf3 is released providing it not a epic fail most will go back to it.
I still have not had the rush scrimming COD4 that used to get from having a close intense scrim of Bf2.
Bf2 had a lot more depth in scrims IMO.
But like I say COD4 is fun even when Bf3 comes out it will carry on with a big player base and clan base just like COD2 has been for a long time.
Everyone needs to remember there a lot of people playing this game that are not from Bf2 so with Bf3 release it wont change anything for them.
Xt1ncT
25th January 2008, 11:52 AM
I doubt it.
This game is WAY better than BF2, and rumours are rife that this game will make WGC, maybe not this year, but alot of talk about 2009.
CoD4 won't be going anywhere, you can quote me on that _b.
This game is nowhere near as good as BF2.
It does have better graphics.
Other than that there is no comparison. It's spammier, some of the guns are ridiculous in the way they work. There is no recoil.
The gameplay is different, and for a while that is refreshing, but other than that it is pretty repetitive - at least in BF2 one game doesn't necessarily reflect the last one you played.
When comparing, people should really be objective and take off the tinted glasses. I understand that a lot of people are over BF2, and that's fine. One of the issues is that there are far too many idiots plaing it - which lessens the gaming experience for a lot of people. The admins do a good job of getting rid of them, but that isn't easy.
There are also some stupid maps - Wake for instance.
Take this out, and have the maps and gameplay that it was designed with and the game is excellent. Actually, there was a stage where it was superb - trying to remember which patch it was - must be getting old :(
I suppose the good thing is that all of us are different and like different things. Personally I hate some of the things in CoD4.
Namely:
It's soooo spammy
No recoil
Airstrikes
Choppers
Having said that, have had some good games of Headquarters and Domination over the last couple of days. But I still think the enjoyment we all got from BF2 when it came out was FAR higher than in CoD4.
5loth
25th January 2008, 11:53 AM
Edited for truth, quoted for accuracy.
COD4 is not a replacement for BF2, it's a replacement for CS/CS:S. If Frontlines: FOW is any good, I can foresee a lot of COD4 teams having issues fielding players in a months time.
CoD4 is not a replacement for CS, its a replacement for CoD2.
i don't know of ANY cs teams who have shifted to cod, they have cs, cs
is a quality game, they don't need to change.
Personally i don't think CoD4 will ever be a WCG game, they have cs for FPS,
the cost of flights/accomodation/everything else for 5 more people for one game
is too hard to justify, especially given I have read they are already under financial strain. so to have a cod game there, they would have to replace cs,
which is BY FAR the most popular game in the world, both public play and competitive.
to say BF2 was a better game however, is a silly statement imo, they are
much different games, catering to different audiences, and if you considered
'good' to be a quality game with minimal flaws, CoD would probably be the winner.
`Dirty Heathen
25th January 2008, 11:54 AM
ahahahahaha
that may be your opinion, however it is flawed :D
bf2 is certainly not better than this game, its different and the two cant really be compared, some will like bf2 more and others will prefer cod4.
strats make all the difference in cod4 aswell, i think you havent played enough competitive teams. because if you play someone with a decent strat you will find you wont have a chance no matter how skilled you are.
cod4 requires alot more teamwork and communication between your team, in battlefield its just one commander yelling orders at everyone.
cod4 also takes alot more fps skill than bf2, so alot of average bf2 players wouldn't like it for that reason.
I agree with most what your saying Switch but player skill and game sense has A LOT to do with winning this game regardless of strats.
Don't get me wrong tactics is a very important part of this game but I still thing individual player skill counts for a hell of a lot.
And XT no offense but how many scrim have played in?
5loth
25th January 2008, 11:57 AM
But like I say COD4 is fun even when Bf3 comes out it will carry on with a big player base and clan base just like COD2 has been for a long time.
Everyone needs to remember there a lot of people playing this game that are not from Bf2 so with Bf3 release it wont change anything for them.
you also need to remember when considering the NZ situation you may aswell
incorporate Australia as that is where the majority of our competition goes on.
CyberGamer, i'd say the hub of australian Call of Duty, has a poll on their front
page asking what game you played before you came to CoD4. The largest
percentage is from CoD2.
From Iconz yes most are from BF2, but from Oceania, its a different story,
and BF3 will have little impact on the playerbase of CoD4.
`Dirty Heathen
25th January 2008, 11:58 AM
This game is nowhere near as good as BF2.
It does have better graphics.
Other than that there is no comparison. It's spammier, some of the guns are ridiculous in the way they work. There is no recoil.
The gameplay is different, and for a while that is refreshing, but other than that it is pretty repetitive - at least in BF2 one game doesn't necessarily reflect the last one you played.
When comparing, people should really be objective and take off the tinted glasses. I understand that a lot of people are over BF2, and that's fine. One of the issues is that there are far too many idiots plaing it - which lessens the gaming experience for a lot of people. The admins do a good job of getting rid of them, but that isn't easy.
There are also some stupid maps - Wake for instance.
Take this out, and have the maps and gameplay that it was designed with and the game is excellent. Actually, there was a stage where it was superb - trying to remember which patch it was - must be getting old :(
I suppose the good thing is that all of us are different and like different things. Personally I hate some of the things in CoD4.
Namely:
It's soooo spammy
No recoil
Airstrikes
Choppers
Having said that, have had some good games of Headquarters and Domination over the last couple of days. But I still think the enjoyment we all got from BF2 when it came out was FAR higher than in CoD4.
Go have a game on the Cyber games pug server with pam its very different game.
I only jump on the pubs now to look for and tards and warm up I enjoy playing pugs a lot more.
switch.
25th January 2008, 12:07 PM
I agree with most what your saying Switch but player skill and game sense has A LOT to do with winning this game regardless of strats.
Don't get me wrong tactics is a very important part of this game but I still thing individual player skill counts for a hell of a lot.
And XT no offense but how many scrim have played in?
Yeah well individual player skill should count for alot, a team of shit players shouldnt be able to beat a good team simply because they have spent hours working out positions and nade throws, however this can be the case sometimes.
if you have two roughly even teams in terms of player skill, it all comes down to strats, teamwork and communication.
Xt1ncT
25th January 2008, 12:17 PM
And XT no offense but how many scrim have played in?In CoD4, not many. In BF2, 2142 and CS plenty.
As you know I'm not in the scrim team for ISF.
I have however helped them out a bit in practice. So have played the PAM mod.
However, I stand by what I said. You'll see in my first point that Isaid the CoD community will stay with the game - just as the CS'ers stay there. However, those of us who came from BF2 will revert to that kind of game.
For me, I prefer the way BF2 works in scrims - I prefer more players in the scrim. CoD4 - to me - is just CS with different graphics and maps. Same guns, same basic premise.
5loth
25th January 2008, 12:19 PM
CoD4 - to me - is just CS with different graphics and maps. Same guns, same basic premise.
that shows a very vague knowledge of the games in question.
to me, CoD4 and CS are completely different games, the only similarities
would be the player size and game mode. but there is a lot more to a game than
that.
SmiLinSniPeR
25th January 2008, 12:27 PM
This game is nowhere near as good as BF2.
It does have better graphics.
Other than that there is no comparison. It's spammier, some of the guns are ridiculous in the way they work. There is no recoil.
The gameplay is different, and for a while that is refreshing, but other than that it is pretty repetitive - at least in BF2 one game doesn't necessarily reflect the last one you played.
When comparing, people should really be objective and take off the tinted glasses. I understand that a lot of people are over BF2, and that's fine. One of the issues is that there are far too many idiots plaing it - which lessens the gaming experience for a lot of people. The admins do a good job of getting rid of them, but that isn't easy.
There are also some stupid maps - Wake for instance.
Take this out, and have the maps and gameplay that it was designed with and the game is excellent. Actually, there was a stage where it was superb - trying to remember which patch it was - must be getting old :(
I suppose the good thing is that all of us are different and like different things. Personally I hate some of the things in CoD4.
Namely:
It's soooo spammy
No recoil
Airstrikes
Choppers
Having said that, have had some good games of Headquarters and Domination over the last couple of days. But I still think the enjoyment we all got from BF2 when it came out was FAR higher than in CoD4.
In my opinion airstrikes an choppers in cod4 are not really a major problem, coming from BF2 where the choppers were controlled by people (insert top pilots name here) they could single handedly wipe out a team in seconds across the whole map not just a small area like in cod4.
Airstrikes you have to earn them unlike BF2 where a guy goes commander an straight away every few minutes has Arty ready to spam.
Dont get me wrong i loved BF2 an all but they are still 2 different games in alot of other ways IE vehicles etc..
An before im asked i was never really a scrim player as such i was just averadge joe pub nub.
elemunk
25th January 2008, 01:05 PM
The two are just not comparable.
I probably fail to mention (I just assume now days that people know) when I talk about games, I focus on the competitive side, thats what I find most fun, BF2 is NOT a competitive game, the reason it took off with so many teams was purely because there was NOTHING else to play that was not CS or CSS.
On a skill level, for scrimming and waring, BF2 has little to none of compared to CoD4.
The way gaming is growing throughout the globe is though competitive gaming, Championship Gaming Series (www.thecgs.com) is the newest (?) and biggest thing to hit the front recently, flaunting competitive gaming in all it's glory, games such as BF2, are designed for 100% randy fun, a way to usher players into competitive gaming.
your right saying alot of the iconz community might flock to BF3, because it will most definitely be a 'fun game', however as sloth brushed over, iconz does not represent Oceania (iconz would be one of, if not the smallest community), not alot of, or any 'competitive teams' call iconz their home.
On another note spig, Frontlines wont even dent CoD4, it's placed in the same category as BF2, large teams, PUB orientated game.
playerB
25th January 2008, 01:21 PM
wheres nick when you need him?
5loth
25th January 2008, 01:24 PM
wheres nick when you need him?
just wait.
his posts take days to type i hear.
winfieldsaregoo
25th January 2008, 01:25 PM
iconz does not represent Oceania (iconz would be one of, if not the smallest community), not alot of, or any 'competitive teams' call iconz their home.
.
lol you should go to the ogn forums its like full of back water hicks,veary small minded comunity and are a bunch of fail noobs to.
also got perma baned in 9 posts was funny
elemunk
25th January 2008, 01:31 PM
Just be aware that was in no way a harmful comment, i'm not calling anyone 'failnoobs' just pointing out that there are three types of players:
a. Strictly social
b. mixed (plays scrims, with little effort, because they enjoy the teamwork factor)
c. Strictly competitive (very little time spent on pubs, put in alot of practise / work for strats and skills)
Iconz is made up from some a. and mostly b. players, there is nothing wrong with that, different strokes for different folks, it's just that there is little to no c. players basing themselves around iconz, (hence alot of iconz players will go back to bf2 / bf3), because I agree, BF2 is more fun for the 'randy have fun with your mates just for the hell of it' type of gaming, theres ALOT more variety, whereas with CoD, it's more about learning, and fine tuning everything down to a point.
pyro
25th January 2008, 01:31 PM
Probably won't take long for it to though.
Let's face it, if we're honest the game isn't as good as BF2 - it's just BF2 is getting a bit old now. It certainly isn't as good to scrim.
Don't forget in BF2, a team with a good strat which they have down to a t, will normally beat a team with exellent individuals with little or no strat.
Whereas in CoD4 IMO it's the opposite.
Bf2 being a better game is a matter of opinion not a fact. BF2 is easier to play, so if your not that skilled of an FPS player sure you will probably lean towards BF2 over COD4.
Scrims wars and pugs are completely different compared to pubs. By the sounds of it you play to much tdm/ffa/dom since thats pertty much where the helis and air strikes make their mark.
Also your comment on strats couldn't be furthur from the truth, strats win you the game plain and simple. Played 1 team last week only just beat them, talked it over and worked out some better strats played the same team a few days later and domintated them. Seen the same thing slutting for other teams. This is one game you cannot just wing it, even against an avg team if your starts are lacking, no matter how good your individual player skill is your in for a surprise.
Don't underestimate any team in this comp, strats win games.
5loth
25th January 2008, 01:35 PM
Don't underestimate any team in this comp, strats win games.
strats combined with skills.
all of the good teams come finals time will be using strats of some sort,
aslong as both teams tactics are solid, it will come down to skill on the day.
Snake_Daddy
25th January 2008, 01:39 PM
I think more adaptation and skill win games tbh
elemunk
25th January 2008, 01:44 PM
I think more adaptation and skill win games tbh
I would agree, by 'strats', you need a basic comprehension of how the game works, and how to adapt to your enemy, plus nade spots etc, then it's down to skill.
winfieldsaregoo
25th January 2008, 01:47 PM
strats combined with skills.
all of the good teams come finals time will be using strats of some sort,
aslong as both teams tactics are solid, it will come down to skill on the day.
and spwan nading :P
Snake_Daddy
25th January 2008, 02:02 PM
Im sure u guys have alot of cool nade spots sussed. I do agree that nade spots are important for gaining position and all ways will be.
But its only a matter of time before the competitive teams know about them.. And have counter tatics for them making nades less important to the game. I sure u guys don get f all nade kills on roll outs against top teams??
switch.
25th January 2008, 02:06 PM
Im sure u guys have alot of cool nade spots sussed. I do agree that nade spots are important for gaining position and all ways will be.
But its only a matter of time before the competitive teams know about them.. And have counter tatics for them making nades less important to the game. I sure u guys don get f all nade kills on roll outs against top teams??
yeah nade kills arnt really a major problem in scrims, nades are used more to stop people rushing then to actually kill. if your lucky you get random nade kills here and there but they dont often turn the game around.
sad.act
25th January 2008, 03:10 PM
I like BF2 and CoD scrims evenly, I only play BF2 now when there is a scrim on etc, but still love the larger strats for more players (mainly because I do them all for 10v10), but I also enjoy the 5v5s of CoD. I actually enjoy the planning and execution of strats more in BF2 though.
=C=
25th January 2008, 03:16 PM
ahahahahaha
that may be your opinion, however it is flawed :D
strats make all the difference in cod4 aswell, i think you havent played enough competitive teams. because if you play someone with a decent strat you will find you wont have a chance no matter how skilled you are.
That opinion right there is flawed mate.
Having the best strat wont give you the 100% guaranteed win if the players them selves don't have the skill and/or the gamesense to know what is going around them and take appropriate action and a reaction to what is about to happen or come.
Same goes vice versa. If all the 5 players are frikin excellent in skills and game sense but the strat is shit the result would be similar.
The two go hand in hand.
if you have two roughly even teams in terms of player skill, it all comes down to strats, teamwork and communication.
You probably contradicted your self then in that top post I quoted.
But you got it right this time.
EDIT: Just looked at this thread and I am wondering why are people discussing this BF2 vs COD4 vs CSS in an Iconz Results Thread.....
Pawny
25th January 2008, 03:46 PM
This is one game you cannot just wing it, even against an avg team if your starts are lacking, no matter how good your individual player skill is your in for a surprise.
QFT
Chook
25th January 2008, 04:05 PM
Strats and aim win games lol.
BF2 is not at all like Cod4.. its huge its broad.. its err.. crap.
Give me a fast paced small mapped shooter anyday.
CSS & CS.. where to start... a block of wood with a gun is not what i call a shooter... infact CSS was made almost just like CS but with updated graphics.. its shows how fukn retarded the CSS makers really are. The only fortunate thing this game ever did was make infiltration/dem based gametype before anyone else and got a whole lot of 90's nerds addicted.. its one saving grace and its not a good attribute of the game.
5loth
25th January 2008, 04:17 PM
Strats and aim win games lol.
BF2 is not at all like Cod4.. its huge its broad.. its err.. crap.
Give me a fast paced small mapped shooter anyday.
CSS & CS.. where to start... a block of wood with a gun is not what i call a shooter... infact CSS was made almost just like CS but with updated graphics.. its shows how fukn retarded the CSS makers really are. The only fortunate thing this game ever did was make infiltration/dem based gametype before anyone else and got a whole lot of 90's nerds addicted.. its one saving grace and its not a good attribute of the game.
hmm...
do i listen to you, or the hundreds of thousands of people that play cs?
cs is the most successful FPS in gaming history for a reason, it is near perfect
for competitive play. games such as CoD, can only hope to reach the level
cs has in functionality (and i hope it does) for competition.
whether you like the game or not, if you think cs is a crap game that only
'addicted 90s nerds' play, then you don't know much at all.
Pawny
25th January 2008, 04:23 PM
It's all to do with updating/patching the bugs/glitches/downfalls of the game. The game will only ever be as good as the developers are willing to let it be. The community is out there to tell them where the problems are, we just have to wait for the patches.
Chook
25th January 2008, 05:39 PM
lol sloth plays cs.
I already accounted for the hundreds of thousands of morons that play that game. Consider yourself one of them.
pyro
25th January 2008, 05:42 PM
hmm...
do i listen to you, or the hundreds of thousands of people that play cs?
Bit like the millions of wow geeks out there, but yea that games awesome too.
Chook
25th January 2008, 05:44 PM
Ahaha.. shot.. yea those 7 million geniuses are right up there with you Sloth.
5loth
25th January 2008, 05:53 PM
WoW and cs are the two most played games on PC in the world atm.
they must be shit.
whether you like them games or not, they are made to a very high quality, WoW especially
given its ongoing maintenance and 24/7 support available.
Snake_Daddy
25th January 2008, 06:09 PM
lol for only what like $30 a month Id expect it..
ps I have know idea how much wow is a month..
I always found css to have good surport flippin things always updating
brucewillis2
25th January 2008, 06:15 PM
I reckon BF2 was more enjoyable than COD4, I thought it flowed better in scrims and allowed for more variety during the entire round. COD4 seems to be a lot of rinse and repeats with slight variations to throw the other team off.
I just look for something bigger with more variety and in my mind cod4 is going in the opposite direction.
I do like the sneaking around business in COD4, that's different for me not being a CS player and quite cool imo.
well there's nothing else out there so COD4 will do for now.
swindle
25th January 2008, 06:24 PM
Strats and aim win games lol.
BF2 is not at all like Cod4.. its huge its broad.. its err.. crap.
Give me a fast paced small mapped shooter anyday.
CSS & CS.. where to start... a block of wood with a gun is not what i call a shooter... infact CSS was made almost just like CS but with updated graphics.. its shows how fukn retarded the CSS makers really are. The only fortunate thing this game ever did was make infiltration/dem based gametype before anyone else and got a whole lot of 90's nerds addicted.. its one saving grace and its not a good attribute of the game.
lol sloth plays cs.
I already accounted for the hundreds of thousands of morons that play that game. Consider yourself one of them.
Ahaha.. shot.. yea those 7 million geniuses are right up there with you Sloth.
Holy crap, i have to go with sloth on your ideas. Sloth is 100% right in what he says...
Your ideas on competitive games are fucked. They're fucked. What would you have replace 1.6/CSS? You have no idea what makes a competitive game and why. Your talking shit, and further more your talking shit about something you, painfully obviously, no 2/5th of fuck all about.
Counter-Strike (like sloth said) is a near perfect game. Thus it is the biggest WCG game (as far as i know) and played by millions of people over the past 10 or so years. You cannot tell me that all those people and the WCG are "wrong" about it. You can't.
fembot
25th January 2008, 06:36 PM
Strats and aim win games lol.
BF2 is not at all like Cod4.. its huge its broad.. its err.. crap.
Give me a fast paced small mapped shooter anyday.
CSS & CS.. where to start... a block of wood with a gun is not what i call a shooter... infact CSS was made almost just like CS but with updated graphics.. its shows how fukn retarded the CSS makers really are. The only fortunate thing this game ever did was make infiltration/dem based gametype before anyone else and got a whole lot of 90's nerds addicted.. its one saving grace and its not a good attribute of the game.
have you been drinking again?
Chook
25th January 2008, 06:38 PM
sorry fem that game really is fkn retarded. haha.
fembot
25th January 2008, 06:39 PM
come on chook... we all know that no game can be better than sof2
swindle
25th January 2008, 06:51 PM
Hes a SOF2 player...ah, that would explain it.
brucewillis2
25th January 2008, 07:05 PM
sorry fem that game really is fkn retarded. haha.
my idiot detector just went off the scale... give us some constructive posts. not that kind of dribble.
fembot
25th January 2008, 07:39 PM
my idiot detector just went off the scale... give us some constructive posts. not that kind of dribble.
He dribbles when he is drunk :P.
Black Heart
25th January 2008, 08:04 PM
I think the potentially best scrim game I have ever seen was Project Reality. It's pace suited the engine hit detection, the weapon strength was well balanced, the vehicles & map size made strats varied. I really liked that game.
COD4 may not be a replacement for CS:S but it's pretty similar to play (from memory I stopped playing CS very much before CSS came out)
Shame it was just a mod that wasn't very popular.
Dreaded_devil
25th January 2008, 09:06 PM
Maybe try playing cod2.. and possibly compare.
Snake_Daddy
26th January 2008, 04:22 AM
css is a cool game but tbh I really did get bored of the rinse and repeat style of the game which im sure when everyone susses out cod4 will become similar... comparing css or cod 4 to bf2 is just fucking stupid.. apples and oranges imo
Chook
26th January 2008, 09:44 PM
Hes a SOF2 player...ah, that would explain it.
rar rar
Goldo
26th January 2008, 10:37 PM
.exe r de kewl kidz playn de sof2
compttive game eh lyke heepz of ppl play it 4 muny
pyro
26th January 2008, 11:51 PM
.exe r de kewl kidz playn de sof2
compttive game eh lyke heepz of ppl play it 4 muny
What are you like 10?
Goldo
27th January 2008, 12:22 AM
What are you like 10?
nour
nataS
29th January 2008, 10:45 PM
28|MB| - 13
9th - 0
Not sure how you want to record it as 9th only had three. I guess it's a forfeit and we don't get the extra point?
Thanks 9th for the game.
Arseynimz
29th January 2008, 10:53 PM
=[GD]= 13 <SD> 2
Thanks heaps SD, and good luck for the rest of the tourney.
krasher
30th January 2008, 11:01 AM
28|MB| - 13
9th - 0
Not sure how you want to record it as 9th only had three. I guess it's a forfeit and we don't get the extra point?
Thanks 9th for the game.
Yeah, sorry we didn't have a full team. Thanks for giving us a game anyway. We tried to put up a fight :P
Hazard
30th January 2008, 09:34 PM
[tsw] - 13
<S.O.R> - 3
gg guys
Vandal
30th January 2008, 10:51 PM
N[z]13 TBAG 1
Spork
30th January 2008, 10:53 PM
GG N[z], we need to practice more I think.
TBAG: 1
N[Z]:13
I think?
The Tick
30th January 2008, 11:05 PM
gg Tbag
Dracor
30th January 2008, 11:09 PM
Skullz won 13-8
http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r224/Dracornz123/skullzvsA13to8.jpg
Great game guys
benlav
30th January 2008, 11:11 PM
GG N[z], we need to practice more I think.
TBAG: 1
N[Z]:13
I think?
TBAG doesn't practice. Wash your mouth out with cock.
brucewillis2
31st January 2008, 12:01 PM
how the fuck do you practice this game anyway? It all seems very chaotic, and perhaps the only way is to scrim a lot.
/EDIT we played SOR last night and it was 13-3 to us? I'm sure it was for iconz. I hardly pay attention these days.
Dracor
31st January 2008, 07:10 PM
how the fuck do you practice this game anyway? It all seems very chaotic, and perhaps the only way is to scrim a lot.
/EDIT we played SOR last night and it was 13-3 to us? I'm sure it was for iconz. I hardly pay attention these days.
You prac during the first 5 rounds of the match, and get horribly owned during them.
gliss
31st January 2008, 07:58 PM
GG tbag heard it was a fun game. Pity i was not there to play.
benlav
31st January 2008, 08:27 PM
GG tbag heard it was a fun game. Pity i was not there to play.
so I guess you werent speaking to a bagger?
Infected
31st January 2008, 09:06 PM
GG tbag heard it was a fun game. Pity i was not there to play.
Team LMG ftw lol.......
gg tbags
..super^
31st January 2008, 10:40 PM
13-11 to Soa thanks DD great game
_Nism0_
31st January 2008, 10:49 PM
Great game DD cheers
prolax
31st January 2008, 11:06 PM
gg isf - so fucking close,
13-12 to GM.
dont know what went wrong tbh, well played :)
Wodger
31st January 2008, 11:06 PM
13-12 to GM. Thanks GM was a tense game :)
kookynic
31st January 2008, 11:08 PM
amazingly close game
GG GM.
Thetruereddevil
31st January 2008, 11:12 PM
well played GM, a fucking good game, bit gutted at the overtime mode, but hey its the same for all:) good luck for the rest of the ladder
Cripple
31st January 2008, 11:23 PM
well played GM, a fucking good game, bit gutted at the overtime mode, but hey its the same for all:) good luck for the rest of the ladder
Would've been good to watch, noticed it going 1-1 for almost all of the second half.
Hard luck on the overtime, been there. Thought it was changed after the second round though. Using the default PAM4 way could be a winner..
Thetruereddevil
31st January 2008, 11:26 PM
Would've been good to watch, noticed it going 1-1 for almost all of the second half.
Hard luck on the overtime, been there. Thought it was changed after the second round though. Using the default PAM4 way could be a winner..
yeah was never more than one or two in it either side, at times i would have preferred to be watching too, but it was a good one
yeah you guys had that in round one, bit gutting, but oh well
5loth
31st January 2008, 11:34 PM
Would've been good to watch, noticed it going 1-1 for almost all of the second half.
Hard luck on the overtime, been there. Thought it was changed after the second round though. Using the default PAM4 way could be a winner..
it should have been changed, as it is a fairly big fault in the system.
Infected
31st January 2008, 11:39 PM
it should have been changed, as it is a fairly big fault in the system.
More important then 5 players (on ONE team) with 50 cal lmg's rofl...
R3DM@N
31st January 2008, 11:49 PM
GG ISF.
I is nubz
SmiLinSniPeR
31st January 2008, 11:55 PM
Big ups to the guys at SOA for the match tonite well played :D
freaktm
1st February 2008, 01:41 AM
yeah cheers for the game GM
was really intense funnnnnnn
heplonjr
1st February 2008, 04:06 PM
Big ups to the guys at SOA for the match tonite well played :D
Cheers smilin, was heaps of fun. gg DD
switch.
4th February 2008, 10:46 PM
13-0 to sila
GG <<SD>>
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.5 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.