View Full Version : cod 5?
[Mgp]
5th December 2007, 02:40 PM
Activision just merged with blizzard and they have announced cod 5 already as being in development.
http://au.gamespy.com/xbox-360/guitar-hero-4/839091p1.html
what time period could this be set? future? :P
brucewillis2
5th December 2007, 03:02 PM
oh noes... I smell a 2142
elemunk
5th December 2007, 03:02 PM
Hopefully cod5 is a console only based game like CoD3 was (too make money) and they continue work on CoD4, after all they did spend years in making it, and have aimed at it being an E-sport game.
xcuzznxtimmyx
5th December 2007, 03:53 PM
Hopefully cod5 is a console only based game like CoD3 was (too make money) and they continue work on CoD4, after all they did spend years in making it, and have aimed at it being an E-sport game.
plus COD4 is really fun to scrim and i wanna play this for as long as possible (competively)
Arseynimz
5th December 2007, 04:08 PM
plus COD4 is really fun to scrim and i wanna play this for as long as possible (competively)
What he said.
1nfamous
5th December 2007, 04:11 PM
Third that.
prolax
5th December 2007, 04:34 PM
4th that.
Addicted
5th December 2007, 04:47 PM
cod4 scrims ftw
KiLL3r
5th December 2007, 05:41 PM
oh noes... I smell a 2142
lol cod4 is 2142, sounds like something much much worse
pyro
5th December 2007, 05:45 PM
lol cod4 is 2142, sounds like something much much worse
bf2 was a good game, 2142 failed horrible. Cod4 is by far the best out of the cod series so please enlighten me on your views as how cod4 is anything like 2142.
prolax
5th December 2007, 05:45 PM
lol cod4 is 2142, sounds like something much much worse
Crysis is 2142 - ouch?
Marak2.0
5th December 2007, 05:55 PM
hmmm thats way 2 soon imo, prob for console. bt then again cod4 is on most consoles.
KiLL3r
5th December 2007, 05:58 PM
bf2 was a good game, 2142 failed horrible. Cod4 is by far the best out of the cod series so please enlighten me on your views as how cod4 is anything like 2142.
it uses its previous game in the series engine and the only change is it being set a few years in the future
Captcol
5th December 2007, 06:04 PM
blatantly stolen from above link
This game has been confirmed as being in development but has not yet been confirmed for this platform. Please check back here for official information.
And I haven't had as much fun since i first played bf2, infact this is more so, and scrimming is excellent
5loth
5th December 2007, 06:08 PM
it uses its previous game in the series engine and the only change is it being set a few years in the future
so you're referring it to being a game that uses the same engine as a previous title in the series, as opposed to the games overall success?
not quite sure which one you consider most important..
KiLL3r
5th December 2007, 06:09 PM
so you're referring it to being a game that uses the same engine as a previous title in the series, as opposed to the games overall success?
not quite sure which one you consider most important..
sry i must of missed the part where i said that made it bad...
oh wait didnt!
5loth
5th December 2007, 06:12 PM
saying 'lol cod4 is 2142' doesn't exactly suggest 'lol cod4 used the same engine as the previous game in the series'.
GoGoWaffles
5th December 2007, 06:12 PM
It will most likely be a pile of crap.
FYI, Infinity ward (CoD, CoD2, CoD4) develop each even numbered CoD game, while Treyarch (CoD:Big Red One, CoD3) develop the uneven numbered titles. (Hence it being announced/developed already)
So yeh, going off their records, CoD5 will be worse than CoD4 in all likeliness.
1nfamous
5th December 2007, 06:14 PM
2142 failed horrible.
Enlighten me as to how it "failed" exactly?
GoGoWaffles
5th December 2007, 06:17 PM
Enlighten me as to how it "failed" exactly?
Same way ET:QW failed, nobody played it
(and the fact it was completely obvious it was just a poorly made mod for BF2 that cost $120)
5loth
5th December 2007, 06:18 PM
Enlighten me as to how it "failed" exactly?
because when it first came out nearly all bf2 teams shifted to 2142,
and realised it was shit and went back to bf2.
1nfamous
5th December 2007, 06:22 PM
I never really thought of it as a "failed" game, more just an unpopular game. There are still a lot of people who play it, and enjoy it. The pubs are normally pretty good numbers wise.
I has nothing on bf2 i know, but did it really fail?
brucewillis2
5th December 2007, 06:22 PM
2142 was a crap game... not even sure why I hated it so much I just found it horrible to play. I know the sound and feel of the weapons didn't help. The amount of upgrades were annoying as well.
I think the rego of the weapons were decent on single shot and terrible at full auto - hard to remember, shock therapy has removed most of the nightmares.
5loth
5th December 2007, 06:23 PM
I never really thought of it as a "failed" game, more just an unpopular game. There are still a lot of people who play it, and enjoy it. The pubs are normally pretty good numbers wise.
I has nothing on bf2 i know, but did it really fail?
depends how you look at it really,
i think the unpopular part is what many would judge as a failed game.
1nfamous
5th December 2007, 06:25 PM
Guess so.
I reckon ET:QW failed tons more then 2142.
5loth
5th December 2007, 06:27 PM
Guess so.
I reckon ET:QW failed tons more then 2142.
i'd say so yeah.
the player base in NZ, and worldwide is much smaller for etqw than even 2142.
some say it was because there was 'too much of a learning curve', but i don't agree tbh.
many teams such as sila learnt how to play the game effectively, and still didn't enjoy it at all.
KiLL3r
5th December 2007, 06:37 PM
saying 'lol cod4 is 2142' doesn't exactly suggest 'lol cod4 used the same engine as the previous game in the series'.
but you also assume because you think 2142 is bad , that i think the same thing, but i loved 2142.
assumption is the mother of all fuckups
5loth
5th December 2007, 06:39 PM
so what did 'lol cod4 is 2142' mean?
han16
5th December 2007, 06:58 PM
Hang on a FUckin mo Activision I still finishing COD4!!!
Slim
5th December 2007, 07:23 PM
2142 is a hell of a lot better than Bf2. Everyone just cried about the genre, which I still don't understand. The 2142 mechanics were a lot more polished, as was the net code. However, this debate has raged on for a long time, and will again not be settled here.
The have only announced that they are making a new COD. I mean shit, it will take at least 2 if not 3 years before its actually published.
5loth
5th December 2007, 07:25 PM
2142 is a hell of a lot better than Bf2. Everyone just cried about the genre, which I still don't understand. The 2142 mechanics were a lot more polished, as was the net code. However, this debate has raged on for a long time, and will again not be settled here.
thats because there is no 'better' or 'worse', its all a matter of opinion.
just turns out most peoples opinion preferred bf2.
Fubar
5th December 2007, 07:40 PM
2142 failed for so many reasons, main ones for me was that it was a reskinned BF2, EA releasing another version of the game on the same engine as BF2 and still failed to fix the engine for either etc etc
ETQW failed before it started.....would be awesome for a clan match but lacked any chance of getting some decent pub games as the level of cooperation required to win was more than what you could achieve on a pub. Most pub games resulted in a massive camp fest. Whats the point of playing a game if your only enjoyment comes from clan matches and you can't enjoy it in your freetime?
COD4 wins for me, its fast, interesting, requires some skill, numerous game modes and besides the noobtube has no failings to me. Wouldn't worry me if it was running on Model T Ford engine, the games works and I love it :)
KiLL3r
5th December 2007, 07:50 PM
so what did 'lol cod4 is 2142' mean?
its means cod4 is just cod2 with somes news skins just like bf2142 was bf2 with some new skins. sheesh
5loth
5th December 2007, 08:07 PM
neither are tbh. 2142 is a much different game to bf2, just like cod4 is to cod2.
han16
5th December 2007, 08:48 PM
I've played all of the above and each one is really good in there own right...it would be silly to try and compare them all!
Matt
5th December 2007, 09:36 PM
cod5: ultra future modern warfare (BF2142 but just as bad)
sad.act
5th December 2007, 09:53 PM
One is an even number.
R3DM@N
5th December 2007, 09:57 PM
It has certainly been a great series it will be ashame for them to ruin it with something lame
Spork
5th December 2007, 10:23 PM
I think you will find that most game development starts as soon or even before the previous one is released.
For example as soon as Vice City was released (or actually I think a couple of months before) San Andreas was in development, and GTA IV has been in development since SA came out. LCS and VCS were just money makers.
SirGrimNZ
5th December 2007, 10:30 PM
Precisly,hence the name.Gta 3 was a revolution,and now Gta:iv will come next year,hoping to be the same.I'm sure after Iv they will have some knock off titles of Gta: (followed by the name of a fictional city) using iv's engine.
pyro
6th December 2007, 12:50 AM
it uses its previous game in the series engine and the only change is it being set a few years in the future
Dude did you even play cod2? Its nothing like it at all, cod2 was a take off of the quake engine with mods, cod4 is another take of the cod2 engine with more mods.
2142 failed in the fact that sequels are meant to improve on their previous games, 2142 clearly didn't do this as everyone just went back to bf2.
GoGoWaffles
6th December 2007, 12:50 AM
One is an even number.
Dear Nublet,
Sif try and troll me you peasant
Simple logic would tell you IW, being the original developers, developed the original CoD (therefore CoD is excluded from the deal). And besides, the deal was only made after the release of CoD2.
However, upon completely realising it was you (you are sad.act, fyi), I came to the conclusion you were asking a serious question under the guise of a sarcastic off-comment (after all, you are you, that being sad.act, in case you had forgotten)
In which case, to put simply, 1 is not an even number, it is what is known as an 'odd' number (still with me sad.act? (Sad.act being you)), even numbers always end in a 0, 2, 4, 6 , 8, while odd numbers end with a 1, 3, 5, 7, 9.
In case this has gone over your head (which in all likeliness it has, you've probably alt-tabbed into another loliconz thread to attempt to troll several times already, you being sad.act). I have devised a simple yet ingenious way of explaining this mathematical theory to you. Here it goes:
In the case of CoD games (CoD being 'Call of Duty' this is known as an acronym, but that's a bit to advanced for you at the moment)
Games ending with
1-3-5-7-9 = BAD
Games ending with
0-2-4-6-8 = FKING ORSUM
You're Welcome,
F0rky
winfieldsaregoo
6th December 2007, 12:56 AM
lol forky you nub :knife:
[Mgp]
6th December 2007, 03:11 PM
Anyone here actually play cod 3? If so please say what the "difference" essentially was between that and cod 2. It got good reviews at the time I recall....I remember wanting to get a 360 just to play it :P..lucky i didnt.
swindle
6th December 2007, 03:12 PM
He is a troll. Those bf2/forum cool guys (the ones who are good at bf2, thus everything else in life) are like 12 year old girls hitting purberty.
One minute they're fine, the next they flaming anyone on the forum for the smallest things. No idea why they always have to troll everything, but hey, who knows with 12 year old pubecent girls.
brucewillis2
6th December 2007, 04:23 PM
all we need now is some WoW guy to come in and try to convince us we should all play some MMORPG.
2142 was ugly, I saw more teamwork and better skill on the BF2 servers. ETQW is a great game to scrim but the pubs sucked ass! Too much teamwork required and you only get that in scrims.
COD4 is an interesting one, people say it is just like CS or CSS... wouldn't know. What I do know is that after only playing 48hrs of the game (according to my stats page) it gets pretty boring quickly. Thank god for clans and scrimming.
Matt
6th December 2007, 06:01 PM
He is a troll. Those bf2/forum cool guys (the ones who are good at bf2, thus everything else in life) are like 12 year old girls hitting purberty.
One minute they're fine, the next they flaming anyone on the forum for the smallest things. No idea why they always have to troll everything, but hey, who knows with 12 year old pubecent girls.
stop being a cunt
teeeheehee
swindle
6th December 2007, 06:59 PM
What I do know is that after only playing 48hrs of the game (according to my stats page) it gets pretty boring quickly. Thank god for clans and scrimming.
Well maybe if you shake things up abit and put down the G36c you might find it more interesting! :D
Goldo
6th December 2007, 08:42 PM
He is a troll. Those bf2/forum cool guys (the ones who are good at bf2, thus everything else in life) are like 12 year old girls hitting purberty.
One minute they're fine, the next they flaming anyone on the forum for the smallest things. No idea why they always have to troll everything, but hey, who knows with 12 year old pubecent girls.
ur bad @ games m8:knife:
Goldo
6th December 2007, 08:43 PM
Now, in srsns, why QQ about the C? I find it a POS tbh, would much rather have AK.
swindle
6th December 2007, 09:54 PM
ur bad @ games m8:knife:
:bounce:
Goldo
6th December 2007, 10:09 PM
It's all about the black midget porn imo.
swindle
6th December 2007, 10:10 PM
It's all about the black midget animal porn imo.
Edited for truth.
Goldo
6th December 2007, 10:12 PM
Miniature ponies + black chicks = win.
swindle
6th December 2007, 10:17 PM
Miniature ponies + black chicks = win.
Wanna do some trading of DVDs?
kilabee
7th December 2007, 08:24 AM
i think we have hit the bottom of the barrel here ppl....lol^^
Matt
7th December 2007, 01:37 PM
:bounce:
I pwned you last night with my Knife :D, and DWA :D. Fembot is tough to kill:cussing:
swindle
7th December 2007, 05:36 PM
I pwned you last night with my Knife :D, and DWA :D. Fembot is tough to kill:cussing:
lol yeah man, you scared the shit outta me with one of those knifes! Made me jump.
Fembot is using juggernoob i bet :P She was mega hard to drop.
[Mgp]
8th December 2007, 02:12 PM
she does not use juggernaut last time i looked.
Goldo
8th December 2007, 02:56 PM
Did you know it's possible to change classes and enable different perks during a round??!!?!!??!?!?!?!?
I didn't!!! :O
swindle
8th December 2007, 03:02 PM
Wtf? How? I thought you couldn't do that...
Hazard
8th December 2007, 03:14 PM
At the end of the round you can, and I think if you join the server, but don't select a team (as in press ESC) you can do it there also.
Goldo
8th December 2007, 03:29 PM
As in preset custom classes -__-
Killing ze joke since 2007 and 2005 respectively :(
fembot
10th December 2007, 12:17 AM
lol yeah man, you scared the shit outta me with one of those knifes! Made me jump.
Fembot is using juggernoob i bet :P She was mega hard to drop.
nope never used it... using the standard weapons as much as I can.
Black Heart
10th December 2007, 01:10 AM
games without medics/insta revives FTW!!
KiLL3r
10th December 2007, 11:08 AM
At the end of the round you can, and I think if you join the server, but don't select a team (as in press ESC) you can do it there also.
yep at the end of the round you can change your setups, but you have to be quick otherwise you might be halfway thru choosing and the map will switch over
TeamWang
10th December 2007, 02:19 PM
yep at the end of the round you can change your setups, but you have to be quick otherwise you might be halfway thru choosing and the map will switch over
Yeah, that's why I keep a couple of similar configs so that I can switch to the other if I screw one up.
Though I always keep 1 shotgun config for a few quick kills when the shipping container level comes up, and before the next level gets voted on. It's a brief good time cutting people down as they reach for F1.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.5 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.